| The Nuclear-Free Future Award | Back to News | News in German |
PART THREEFUNDAMENTAL PHYSICAL
|
THE NON-TRANSMUTABILITY PRINCIPLE OF FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICAL SCIENTIFIC NATURE
August 1, 1997 Consider the nature of this principle, for example, as it does necessarily apply to the fundamental physical scientific nature of ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIVITY. The principle states that electromagnetic causes, and only electromagnetic causes, in the first place, can produce electromagnetic effects, and only electromagnetic effects, in the second place, and vice versa. The principle implies that so-called fundamental physical scientific GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTIVITY, in the first place, cannot be the cause of electromagnetic effects and only electromagnetic effects, in the second place, under any circumstances whatsoever, and vice versa. And the principle implies that so-called fundamental physical scientific STRONG and WEAK NUCLEAR INTERACTIVITIES, in the first place, cannot be the cause of electromagnetic effects and only electromagnetic effects, in the second place, under any circumstances whatsoever, and vice versa.
This simple, fundamental, logical, philosophical, scientific principle,
when directly combined with the comprehensive empirical physical
scientific fact that all physical scientific observations and
measurements do indeed embody electromagnetic interactivities
and only electromagnetic interactivities, certifies and validates
my simple, rigorous, conclusive, universal case for fundamental
physical scientific ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIVIY ONLY, AS A UNIFIED
WHOLE.
© Copyright Richard Savage |
| Part One | Part Two | Part Three Contents | Debate Corner |
AN IMPORTANT HISTORIC BORING POINT OF VIEWA colonial American, named Benjamin Thompson, was apparently the first scientist to discern the connection between mechanical energy and heat. He observed huge cylinders of brass being bored to make cannon. In those days, such a boring machine was powered by a horse walking on a treadmill mechanism. Cannon borers knew well that when boring, the boring tool and the hot metal chips it produced would become very hot. Thompson discovered a remarkable relationship: the rate at which the horse worked appeared to be directly proportional to the temperature of the boring tool and the hot metal chips it produced. Later on, James Joule performed careful experiments which confirmed Thompson's observations. At a later point, Robert Mayer, a young German physician, derived a fundamental property of this ENERGY; recognizing that ENERGY can be changed from one form to another, however, ENERGY cannot be created or destroyed. In the case of the cannon boring operation, the HEAT of the boring too land the HEAT of the hot metal chips it produced, was a form of some of the same ENERGY produced by the mechanical efforts of the horse. In reference to current, controversial, scientific and technological developments, this same principle of ENERGY applies directly to the operation of PARTICLE ACCELERATORS and so designated PARTICLE ACCELERATOR PROJECTS AND PURPOSES. Within all particle accelerators, high energy particle collision processes and high energy particle interaction phenomena, embody conditions and events which are produced directly by the WORK OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY. Is not ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY power to a particle accelerator, what horse power was to a cannon borer? At this advanced stage of HIGH ENERGY PARTICLE PHYSICS, we know that ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY is able to produce extremely high energy conditions which physicists believe prevailed at a very early stage of universal existence. Might it not also be the case that the universe, at such an early stage of its existence, would also have "employed" ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY to produce the same magnitude of prevailing high energy conditions and high energy particle interactions on a macrophysical scale, which are produced today on a microphysical scale by particle accelerators? The preceding, important historic boring point of view, in relationship to its contemporary counterpart and the corresponding big debate surrounding the questionable need for more, even larger, SUPER PARTICLE ACCELERATORS, would seem to settle and clarify the current issue, satisfactorily, once and for all.
CONCLUSION: The underlying, fundamental physical nature of anything
and everything that can be produced by the very expensive work
of more powerful particle accelerators, will be some form, or
another, of more ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY. "Capito!"
© Copyright 1993
Richard Savage |
| Part One | Part Two | Part Three Contents | Debate Corner |
THE SIMPLICITY OF COMPLEXITY PRINCIPLEAs Gregory Bateson said it, clearly and cleverly, within the context of his lecture, "SIMPLE THINKING", which he delivered at the Esalen Institute in Big Sir, California in April of 1980; with respect to a story which has been repeated dozens of times during the course of scientific history: "What originally begins as a few, relatively simple, elementary ideas and concepts, then gradually becomes more and more involved, more and more tangled, until the whole edifice of a particular theory becomes intolerably complex, and so obviously so; and when you find this happening, there is something wrong. The sense of unnecessary complexity, is one of the things you need to have a nose for if you are going to go into the genuine business of science. On the other hand, every now and then, it occurs in science that there are these sudden moments when various seemingly separate things are combined and fitted together exactly." This may very well be the case with respect to my simple observation that all physical scientific observations and measurements embody electromagnetic interactivities only, while so-called non-electromagnetic interactivities are simply not physically observable and not physically measurable, in fundamental physical terms other than electromagnetic fundamental physical terms only. Thus physical science is strictly a matter of electromagnetic affairs. In accordance with my simple observation, it would seem that the simplicity of complexity is strictly a matter of electromagnetic interactivity, while the complexity of simplicity is strictly a matter of electromagnetic interactivity also. For example, all life, all living physical activities and interactivities, on all scales and on all levels, is strictly a physical matter of electromagnetic interactivity only. The preceding, foregone conclusion can be readily confirmed by referring to established, physical-chemical properties of both inorganic material substances and organic material substances, the entire spectrum of which will be found to be strictly a matter of cumulative and combined electromagnetic interactivities only.
This remarkable comprehensivity would seem to be the thrust of
my simple observation, as it pertains to the nature of the work
which is being done in the search for simple rules of complexity
in the field of complexity science. As scientists in the field,
search for simple rules of complexity, they ought not to turn
a blind eye to the electromagnetic light of the matter.
© Copyright 1996 Richard Savage |
| Part One | Part Two | Part Three Contents | Debate Corner |
ELECTROMAGNETIC LINGUISTICSNot unlike the correspondence made and the similarity founded between the fundamental natures of the established fields of electromagnetics and mathematics, a similar correspondence and a similar similarity pertain to the relationship founded between the established fields of electromagnetics and linguistics. For one thing, it should be noted that the science of linguistics can be properly considered to be an associated branch of physical science, in the sense that physical entities, physical activities, physical operations, physical mechanisms, physical behaviors, physical conducts and physical products are inherently associated with the processes embodied by people speaking and people listening, and people writing and people reading, and people communicating by means of linguistic scientific systems, in general, by physical means of communication systems in general, in all cases, without exception. And in all respects, the physical scientific nature of the corresponding physical characteristics and the physical processes and interactions that are involved, is strictly a matter of cumulative and combined fundamental physical scientific electromagnetic nature only. Likewise, it should be noted that the form and functions and the substance and contents embodied by the practice of the science of linguistics, can also be seen to directly correspond to the characteristic nature embodied by fundamental physical scientific electromagnetic interactivities. The primary intents and purposes of the practice of linguistic science, directly point to its fundamental capacity to convey, to transfer and to exchange meaningful information by physical means of expressing and exchanging information. In a profoundly similar capacity, it is precisely the fundamental physical nature of electromagnetic interactivity which serves to function as the fundamental physical language of expression and exchange of fundamental physical information, which is engaged, necessarily, from the ground up, so to speak, by all forms of physical processes and physical interactivities, on all scales and on all levels, without exception. And so it can be rigorously said that the fundamental physical scientific electromagnetic-signal language of the physical universe as a whole, clearly embodies all of the many different physical languages which are practiced by the many different biological species of living physical creatures which inhabit the physical world. This fully established biological fact does indeed refer to the general linguistic practices of, of all kinds of species of living physical creatures, without exception, from miniscule amoebas at work in the earth beneath our feet, to magnanimous, human members of highly esteemed, English literary societies, at leisure, in Great Britain and beyond. For example, with respect to our special species' case, we cannot alter the fundamental nature of the matter, whether the physical signals are sent in the secondary form of smoke signals from hilltop to hilltop, or by way of drumbeats from jungle settlement to jungle settlement, or whether the physical signals are sent in the secondary form of fiber-optic cable telephone signals from sea to shining sea and from shore to shifting shore, or in any of the various, possible other secondary physical forms of different ways of which there are many more.
Moreover, generally speaking, grammatical structures, particularly
sentence structures, and their parts and contents and the corresponding
substance of information contained therein, contained within the
grammatical, physical compositions of words, generally
embody electromagnetic (physical) subjects, which perform electromagnetic
(physical) actions, and thereby predicate electromagnetic (physical)
results, with respect to electromagnetic (physical) objects. In
other words, using the familiar, key parts of speech; (electromagnetic)
nouns, pronouns or proper nouns, execute (electromagnetic) verbs,
with respect to (electromagnetic) objects. Linguistically speaking,
this general rule pertains to the vast, manifold nature of all
that which can be expressed and described to take place physically,
i.e. all that which can be considered to happen physically, in
any way, shape or form, and in all such cases without exception;
not excluding the most direct, immediate case of the very physical
words which have been physically composed and printed on this
physical page of paper, which you, dear reader, are now physically
reading, electromagnetically! "Capito!"
© Copyright 1997
Richard Savage |
| Part One | Part Two | Part Three Contents | Debate Corner |
UNIPHYSICSYLLOGISM
All physical scientific observations and measurements embody fundamental
physical scientific interactions only.
One, and only one, physical form of established fundamental physical
scientific interactivity can be observed and measured: ELECTROMAGNETIC
INTERACTIVITY.
All physical scientific observations and measurements embody fundamental
physical scientific ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIONS ONLY.
© Copyright 1997 Richard Savage |
| Part One | Part Two | Part Three Contents | Debate Corner |
CURRENT STATUS REPORT & NOTICEAt this time, Summer 1998, I am seeking to disclose the full substance and the contents of my work and my respective case, to the physical scientific community, as a whole, and to the ordinary world at large, by means of standard publications of my work by standard publishers of scholarly works, in bookforms, periodical journal and magazine article-forms, and by means of mass-media, in general, i.e. newspaper, radio and television journalistic formats. Editors, reporters and producers who are, respectively, able and willing to appreciate the valid nature and the "gravity" of my work and the corresponding controversy which will necessarily surround it, in terms of the news-market-place value it will be certain to generate, as well as in terms of its scientific significance, at this time, as we now approach the year 2000 and the new millennium beyond, are those key people whom I hope to reach with this important notice about my rigorous and conclusive case, which shall indeed prevail.
Publishers, editors, reporters and program producers, who are
seriously interested in my documented case, please contact me
at the following office address, phone and fax numbers:
Richard Savage |
| Part One | Part Two | Part Three Contents | Debate Corner |
BY THE LIGHT OF WORDS
Yet let me so compose a simple verse of prose, if not in the form
of a poem, albeit in a basic linguistic form by which all things
to show them; and thus in terms of natural light by which all
ken can know them. As we, as well, may know our physical selves
to be yet just so also: various unified physical forms of
fundamental natural light. And we, as all good readers do, can
much all see forthright and read all that which is in sight and insight,
a manifold matter of one, and only one, universal versatile light.
© Copyright: Richard Savage |
| Part One | Part Two | Part Three Contents | Debate Corner |
|
© Copyright 1997-99
.
Nuclear-Free Future Award . Schellingstr.
24, Rgb. . München D-80799 |